HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allen, M. S. Articles by Pairolero, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allen, M. S. Articles by Pairolero, P. C.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 56, 620-623, Copyright © 1993 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Equipment for thoracoscopy

MS Allen, VF Trastek, RC Daly, C Deschamps and PC Pairolero
Section of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

The combining of miniaturized video technology with thoracoscopy now allows surgeons to perform a variety of thoracic procedures percutaneously. Both rigid and flexible video thoracoscopes are available. The rigid endoscope has a camera located proximally at the eye-piece and is capable of excellent resolution. However, visualization of the entire pleural cavity is difficult because of the rigid chest wall. Placing the video camera at the distal end of a flexible thoracoscope, as in the electronic video thoracoscope (EVE-L; Fujinon, Wayne, NJ), yields better visualization of these relatively inaccessible areas. However, disadvantages of the flexible thoracoscope include increased expense and complexity, reduced resolution as compared to rigid systems, and the need for a strobed light source, thus making video-assisted surgery more difficult. Thoracoscopic wedge excisions of the lung are now possible because of the adaptation of gastrointestinal staplers for percutaneous use. The initial design consisted of a reloadable 30-mm disposable stapler. Newer models, however, have a longer staple line and some are reusable. Future refinements may allow the head of the instrument to articulate, thus permitting it to be applied to the lung at various angles. Thoracoscopic ports that provide an air-tight seal are available but are not essential; therefore, standard thoracotomy instruments can be utilized through small open incisions. Specialized disposable thoracoscopic instruments are also available, including scissors, dissectors, and fan retractors. It is hoped that the future will bring improved optics, better staplers, and refined percutaneous instrumentation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. E. Maziak and M. F. McKneally Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1995; 59(3): 780 - 781. [Full Text]

				M. Kadokura, T. V. Colby, J. L. Myers, M. S. Allen, C. Deschamps, V. F. Trastek, and P. C. Pairolero Pathologic comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgical lung biopsy with traditional open lung biopsy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1995; 109(3): 494 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text]