HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heerdt, P. M. Articles by Rosenbloom, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heerdt, P. M. Articles by Rosenbloom, M.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 54, 959-966, Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Comparison of cardiac output measured by intrapulmonary artery Doppler, thermodilution, and electromagnetometry

PM Heerdt, CG Pond, GA Blessios and M Rosenbloom
Section of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

A Doppler pulmonary artery catheter system (Doppler cardiac output monitor or DOPCOM) that continuously measures instantaneous and mean cardiac output was recently introduced. Because thermodilution (TD) flow measurements may not represent an adequate standard, the present study was designed to compare TD and DOPCOM cardiac output measurements with aortic electromagnetic (EM) flow in cardiac surgical patients. Twenty-one patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled in the study. Simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by all three methods was performed before cardiopulmonary bypass, after cardiopulmonary bypass with the aorta cannulated and volume intermittently infused, and after decannulation. Analysis of all data demonstrated fair TD and EM correlation (r = 0.80), with minimal bias (0.03 +/- 1.21 L/min) and a median absolute error of 0.53 L/min; DOPCOM and EM data showed moderate correlation (r = 0.64), a bias of -0.61 +/- 1.50 L/min, and a median absolute error the same as TD (0.51 L/min). However, distribution of DOPCOM values was heavily skewed by 3 patients in whom flow measurements immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass were markedly different between the DOPCOM and electromagnetometry, probably because of malposition of the Doppler transducers secondary to partial catheter withdrawal during bypass. Consistent with this theory was the finding that before CPB, the DOPCOM was significantly better than TD in predicting EM flow (median absolute error: DOPCOM, 0.12 L/min, and TD, 0.48 L/min; p = 0.04). Our data suggest that, in general, the DOPCOM shows similar precision to TD for predicting EM flow measurements, although the DOPCOM may underestimate actual flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. W. Schindler, T. W. L. Scheeren, O. Picker, M. Doehn, and J. Tarnow Accuracy of feedback-controlled oxygen delivery into a closed anaesthesia circuit for measurement of oxygen consumption Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 281 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lotz, C. Meier, A. Leppert, and M. Galanski Cardiovascular Flow Measurement with Phase-Contrast MR Imaging: Basic Facts and Implementation RadioGraphics, May 1, 2002; 22(3): 651 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Heerdt and M. L. Dickstein Assessment of Right Ventricular Function Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1997; 1(3): 215 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]