ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiore, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barner, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiore, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barner, H. B.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 54, 68-73, Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Mitral valve replacement: randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic- Hall prostheses

AC Fiore, KS Naunheim, S D'Orazio, GC Kaiser, LR McBride, DG Pennington, PS Peigh, VL Willman, AJ Labovitz and HB Barner
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiology, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri 63110-0250.

To better define the merits of the bileaflet and tilting-disc valves, we prospectively randomized 102 patients (mean age, 57 years; range, 11 to 85 years) to receive either the St. Jude (n = 55) or the Medtronic- Hall (n = 47) mitral valve prosthesis between September 1986 and May 1991. The two groups were not different with respect to preoperative New York Heart Association class, incidence of mitral stenosis and insufficiency, angina score, extent of coronary artery disease, ventricular function, completeness of revascularization, or cross-clamp or bypass time. The hospital mortality (14.5% versus 10.6%, St. Jude versus Medtronic-Hall) and late mortality (7.3% versus 2.1%) were not significantly different. Follow-up was complete in 84 of 89 hospital survivors (94%) with a mean of 26 months (range, 1 to 60 months). The linearized rates of valve-related events and the 3-year actuarial survival demonstrated no significant differences between both cohorts. Comparison of the clinical outcome and echocardiographic parameters obtained at the time of follow-up demonstrated no significant differences between the two prostheses. These data indicate that the Medtronic-Hall and St. Jude mitral prostheses are similar with respect to their rates of valve-related complications and hemodynamic profiles. This study suggests that there is no difference between the St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses with regard to early clinical performance or hemodynamic results and therefore does not support the preferential selection of either prosthesis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki
Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. Machler, G. Reiter, M. Perthel, U. Reiter, P. Bergmann, M. Zink, R. Rienmuller, and J. Laas
Influence of a tilting prosthetic mitral valve orientation on the left ventricular flow -- an experimental in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 32(1): 102 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
V. Kutay, K. Kirali, H. Ekim, and C. Yakut
Effects of Giant Left Atrium on Thromboembolism after Mitral Valve Replacement
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, June 1, 2005; 13(2): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn
Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
C van Doorn, R Yates, V Tsang, M deLeval, and M Elliott
Mitral valve replacement in children: mortality, morbidity, and haemodynamic status up to medium term follow up
Heart, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 636 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
W.R. E. Jamieson, R. T. Miyagishima, G. L. Grunkemeier, E. Germann, C. Henderson, G. J. Fradet, L. H. Burr, and S. V. Lichtenstein
Bileaflet mechanical prostheses performance in mitral position
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 1999; 15(6): 786 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. C. Fiore, H. B. Barner, M. T. Swartz, L. R. McBride, A. J. Labovitz, K. J. Vaca, J. St. Vrain, G. L. Grunkemeier, and G. C. Kaiser
Mitral valve replacement: randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic Hall prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 707 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
W.R. E. Jamieson, A. I. Munro, R. T. Miyagishima, G. L. Grunkemeier, L. H. Burr, S. V. Lichtenstein, and G. F. O. Tyers
Multiple mechanical valve replacement surgery comparison of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prostheses
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 13(2): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. A. Grossi, A. C. Galloway, J. S. Miller, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, R. Esposito, J. Delianides, P. M. Buttenheim, F. G. Baumann, F. C. Spencer, et al.
Valve Repair Versus Replacement For Mitral Insufficiency: When Is A Mechanical Valve Still Indicated?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1998; 115(2): 389 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. E. David, V. L. Gott, L. A. Harker, G. E. Miller Jr, D. C. Naftel, A. G. G. Turpie, and C. W. Akins
Mechanical Valves
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1567 - 1570.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Abe, K. Kamata, K. Kuwaki, K. Komatsu, and S. Komatsu
Ten Years' Experience of Aortic Valve Replacement With the Omnicarbon Valve Prosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1996; 61(4): 1182 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Akins
Long-Term Results With the Medtronic-Hall Valvular Prosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1996; 61(3): 806 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Akins
Results With Mechanical Cardiac Valvular Prostheses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1836 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. G. Masters, A. L. Pipe, V. M. Walley, and W. J. Keon
Comparative results with the St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall mechanical valves
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1995; 110(3): 663 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Ibrahim, H. O'Kane, J. Cleland, D. Gladstone, M. Sarsam, and C. Patterson
The St. Jude Medical prosthesisA thirteen-year experience
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1994; 108(2): 221 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Fernandez, G. W. Laub, M. S. Adkins, W. A. Anderson, C. Chen, B. M. Bailey, L. M. Nealon, and L. B. McGrath
Early and late-phase events after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1200 patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 394 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.