HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walley, V. M. Articles by Keon, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walley, V. M. Articles by Keon, W. J.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 54, 111-116, Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Ionescu-Shiley valve failure. I: Experience with 125 standard-profile explants

VM Walley, CA Keon, M Khalili, D Moher, M Campagna and WJ Keon
Department of Pathology, University of Ottawa, Canada.

A group of standard-profile Ionescu-Shiley valve implants, 357 aortic and 190 mitral, was reviewed for cases of failure requiring surgical explantation. To date, 90 (25.2%) of the aortic and 35 (18.4%) of the mitral valves have failed, and are the subject of this analysis. Observations of these explants confirm previous suggestions about the clinical and pathologic patterns of the Ionescu-Shiley valve's failure, but are extended in this study to allow more confident statistical analyses. Cusp tear with insufficiency remains the most important reason for explantation, precipitating removal to date of 19.1% of the aortic and 10.0% of the mitral valves implanted. This difference, aortic versus mitral, is significant (p less than 0.006) and the reverse of observations made in other studies of pericardial valves. In this review there is no significant difference in the proportion of aortic and mitral valves that failed with calcification (2.2% and 3.1%, respectively). Aortic Ionescu-Shiley valves failing with tears had a mean of 3.1 tears per valve, whereas mitral valves had 1.2. Aortic valves also showed considerably more pretear wear than did mitral valves. Although the large number of these Ionescu-Shiley valve failures has been a profound clinical disappointment, it has provided an opportunity to observe and detail the pathology of their failure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Machida, H. Ishibashi-Ueda, K. Nakano, Y. Sasako, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Minatoya, H. Imamura, and S. Kitamura A morphologic study of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 649 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]