ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jemi Olak
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olak, J.
Right arrow Articles by Detsky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olak, J.
Right arrow Articles by Detsky, A.

Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:493-497
© 1992 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Surgical decision analysis: Esophagectomy/esophagogastrectomy with or without drainage?

Jemi Olak, MD*, Allan Detsky, MD

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Accepted for publication October 9, 1991.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Olak, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, MCV Station, PO Box 68, Richmond, VA 23298-0068 USA.

Decision analysis was used to compare three management strategies for patients undergoing esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia: drain all patients with either pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty, drain no patient, or perform a test that stratifies patients into high-risk and low-risk groups for development of gastric outlet obstruction and drain the high-risk group. Results indicate that a "drain all" approach is appropriate in clinical settings where the risk of gastric outlet obstruction is greater than 10%, as long as the drainage procedure is 95% effective. If a test were developed to stratify patients, it would have to have a sensitivity of 807, when its specificity was 100%, and would require a higher sensitivity as the specificity fell below 100%.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
M. Junemann-Ramirez, M. Y. Awan, Z. M. Khan, and J. S. Rahamim
Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2005; 27(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. S. Detsky, G. Naglie, M. D. Krahn, D. Naimark, and D. A. Redelmeier
Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 1--Getting Started
Med Decis Making, April 1, 1997; 17(2): 123 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. K. Plume
Choices, chances, values
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1992; 53(3): 373 - 373.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.