| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:191-199
© 1992 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, and the Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
* Address reprint requests to Dr Carabello, Cardiology Division, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425.
In the past 15 years three major advancements have improved the lot of our patients with left-sided valvular regurgitation. First, the concept that mitral and aortic regurgitation were similar volume overloading lesions has changed. Mitral regurgitation constitutes a nearly pure volume overload wherein the excess volume is ejected against relatively low pressure into the left atrium. On the other hand, aortic regurgitation represents a combined pressure and volume overload in which the excess volume being pumped is ejected against the relatively high pressure of the aorta. These differences in loading between mitral and aortic regurgitation produce a different response to operation. Afterload reduction after correction of aortic regurgitation increases ejection performance if it was decreased preoperatively. Conversely, afterload increases after mitral valve replacement, decreasing ejection performance. These differences make the left ventricle in mitral regurgitation less tolerant of preoperative dysfunction than the left ventricle in aortic regurgitation. Second, with respect to aortic regurgitation, reproducible indexes have been developed that identify when left ventricular dysfunction is present, leading to earlier operation in an attempt to avoid permanent ventricular dysfunction. In turn, earlier operation has led to a fall in operative mortality rate and an almost universal increase in left ventricular function if it was depressed preoperatively. Third, with regard to mitral regurgitation, recognition of the importance of the mitral valve apparatus in maintaining left ventricular function has led to an increased emphasis on chordal preservation during mitral valve operations. Early indicators suggest that these techniques will lead to improved postoperative left ventricular function, reduced operative mortality, and enhanced long-term survivorship for patients with mitral regurgitation. Thus, a change in concept regarding the pathophysiology of these lesions, a change in referral for patients with aortic regurgitation, and a change in operation for patients with mitral regurgitation have led to a favorable alteration in the unnatural history of left-sided valvular regurgitation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. D. Buckberg, C. L. Athanasuleas, A. S. Wechsler, F. Beyersdorf, J. V. Conte, and J. E. Strobeck The STICH trial unravelled Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2010; 12(10): 1024 - 1027. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. D. Buckberg and The RESTORE Group Surgical planning for surgical ventricular restoration involves decision options on form versus disease Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2010; 37(5): 1100 - 1103. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. D. Buckberg and C. L. Athanasuleas The STICH trial: Misguided conclusions. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2009; 138(5): 1060 - 1064.e2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al. 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. 2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Mihaljevic, M. R. Sayeed, S. C. Stamou, and S. Paul Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Disease Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 825 - 840. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Mihaljevic, S. Paul, L. H. Cohn, and A. Wechsler Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Disease Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 791 - 810. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Gaynor, M. P. Feneley, S. A. Gall Jr., M. A. Savitt, S. C. Silvestry, J. W. Davis, J. S. Rankin, and D. D. Glower Jr. LEFT VENTRICULAR ADAPTATION TO AORTIC REGURGITATION IN CONSCIOUS DOGS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1997; 113(1): 149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. D. Biasi, A. Paje, M. Salati, G. Bozzi, M. Viecca, A. Cialfi, M. D. Biasi, S. Guzzetti, and C. Santoli Surgical timing in aortic regurgitation: Left ventricular function analysis by contractility score Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1994; 58(2): 509 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
