HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shennib, H. Articles by Mulder, D. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shennib, H. Articles by Mulder, D. S.

Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:630-635
© 1991 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Phenotypic expression of bronchoalveolar lavage cells in lung rejection and infection

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Accepted for publication December 27, 1990.

^_* Address reprint requests to Dr Shennib, The Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, Room 9827 L.H., Montreal, Que, Canada H3G 1A4.

The differentiation of episodes of lung allograft rejection from infection continues to be a problem. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has recently gained some success in the diagnosis and management of interstitial lung disease. To assess the usefulness of BAL in differentiating between lung allograft rejection and infection, we examined the differences in cellular subsets of BAL and peripheral blood (PBL) samples in a controlled canine model of rejection or pneumonia. Single-lung allotransplants were allowed to undergo rejection by withdrawing immunosuppressive agents (n = 6). In another group of dogs (n = 5), pneumonia was induced by transbronchial injection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and melted agar followed by bronchial fulguration. Cells obtained from bronchoscopic BAL and PBL samples were labeled with functionally characterized cross-reactive murine monoclonal antibodies. Transthoracic needle biopsies and transbronchial biopsies were done to assess their adequacy in examining the rejecting or infected lungs and were compared with open lung biopsies. We found the following: (1) the percentage of DT2-labeled cells was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in BAL samples from rejecting lungs compared with infected lungs; (2) the PBL/BAL ratio of DT2-labeled cell percentages was significantly higher in pneumonia (1.7 ± 0.3) than rejection (0.5 ± 0.2) (p < 0.004); (3) the percentage of E11-labeled cells in PBL samples was significantly higher (p < 0.02) in rejection than in infection; and (4) the ratio of WIG4 to DT2 cellular subset percentages in BAL samples from rejection (26.8 ± 9.9) was significantly lower than from infection (61.0 ± 22.9) (p < 0.03). Transthoracic and transbronchial biopsies did not always yield representative specimens. We conclude that differences in cellular subset composition in BAL and PBL samples from lung allotransplant rejection and pneumonia do occur. These changes may reflect the specific mechanisms of lung injury in rejection and in pneumonia. With further understanding of these changes, examination of PBL and BAL samples from lung transplant recipients will allow easier and safer differentiation of episodes of rejection from pneumonia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ono, H. Yokomise, K. Muro, K. Inui, S. Hitomi, J. Yodoi, and H. Wada Expression of adult T-cell leukemia-derived factor in bronchoalveolar lavage cells after canine lung transplantation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1995; 110(1): 15 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. Adoumie, C. Serrick, A. Giaid, and H. Shennib Early cellular events in the lung allograft Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1992; 54(6): 1071 - 1077. [Abstract] [PDF]