HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eng, J. Articles by Murday, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Eng, J. Articles by Murday, A. J.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 51, 200-203, Copyright © 1991 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Long-term results of Ionescu-Shiley valve in the tricuspid position

J Eng, PS Ravichandran, PH Kay and AJ Murday
Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, England.

A retrospective analysis of the long-term results of using the Ionescu- Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position was carried out on 73 patients (8 men, 65 women). Of these procedures, ten were tricuspid valve replacement alone and the remainder were in combination with other valve procedures. The mean follow-up was 9.6 years (range, 4 to 18 years). The mean age of the patients was 53 years (range, 27 to 78 years). Seventy-one of the patients suffered tricuspid valve dysfunction from rheumatic heart disease. There were 13 postoperative deaths (within 30 days), giving a mortality rate of 17.8%. The actuarial survival at 10 years was 71% +/- 4.2%. Of the survivors, 49 (79.6%) were in functional class I or II. Primary tissue valve failure in the tricuspid position occurred in 1 patient 12 years after implantation and required reoperation. In another patient bioprosthetic tricuspid valve endocarditis developed. There was no incidence of thromboembolic complications. We conclude that the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis was a satisfactory prosthesis in the tricuspid position in patients with acquired valvar dysfunction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Nakano, H. Ishibashi-Ueda, J. Kobayashi, Y. Sasako, and T. Yagihara Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprostheses: long-term results and causes of valve dysfunction Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 105 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nakano, K. Eishi, Y. Kosakai, F. Isobe, Y. Sasako, S. Nagata, H. Ueda, Y. Kito, and Y. Kawashima TEN-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH THE CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL XENOGRAFT IN THE TRICUSPID POSITION J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1996; 111(3): 605 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. E. Scully and C. S. Armstrong Tricuspid valve replacement: Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1995; 109(6): 1035 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text]