ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
David H. Harpole, Jr
Walter G. Wolfe
Peter Van Trigt
Robert H. Jones
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harpole, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harpole, D. H., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R. H.

Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:866-874
© 1990 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Effects of standard mitral valve replacement on left ventricular function

David H. Harpole, Jr, MD, J.Scott Rankin, MD*, Walter G. Wolfe, MD, Fiona M. Clements, MD, Peter Van Trigt, MD, W.Glenn Young, MD, Robert H. Jones, MD

Departments of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina USA

* Address reprint requests to Dr Rankin, PO Box 3851, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Recent studies have suggested that excision of the mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement impairs left ventricular performance. However, functional measurements in humans have been difficult to obtain in a load-independent fashion. To investigate this concept, 12 patients (mean age, 65 ± 8 years; mean New York Heart Association functional class, 3.3 ± 0.7) with 4+ mitral regurgitation (n = 8) or mitral stenosis (valve area, 1.2 ± 0.2 cm2) (n = 4) underwent prosthetic valve replacement using crystalloid cardioplegia. No patient required therapeutic inotropic support, every patient had at least the anterior mitral leaflet excised, and paced heart rate was maintained constant throughout. Left ventricular volume was measured with radionuclide angiocardiography, left ventricular pressure with a 3F micromanometer, and left ventricular wall volume with two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Left ventricular preload was varied over a mean enddiastolic pressure range of 9 to 20 mm Hg and an end-diastolic volume range of 134 to 170 mL to generate four to five steady-state pressure-volume loops before and ten minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass. Left ventricular performance was estimated with the stroke work/end-diastolic volume relationship, which is insensitive to load. After bypass, no significant change (p > 0.1) was noted in wall volume for patients with mitral regurgitation or mitral stenosis (175 ± 68 to 189 ± 63 mL/m2 and 130 ± 22 to 127 ± 19 mL/m2, respectively). The stroke work/end-diastolic volume relationships were highly linear before and after bypass with a mean linear regression coefficient of 0.96 ± 0.03, and the slope and x-intercept were not changed after bypass (p > 0.1). These data suggest that partial excision of the mitral apparatus does not significantly impair left ventricular performance during the early period after routine valve replacement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. A. Milano, M. A. Daneshmand, J. S. Rankin, E. Honeycutt, M. L. Williams, M. Swaminathan, L. Linblad, L. K. Shaw, D. D. Glower, and P. K. Smith
Survival Prognosis and Surgical Management of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 735 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. M. Suri, H. V. Schaff, J. A. Dearani, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, C. J. Mullany, M. E. Sarano, and T. A. Orszulak
Determinants of early decline in ejection fraction after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 442 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. Sarnowski, A. Szyszka, Z. Oko-Sarnowska, P. Buczkowski, and W. Dyszkiewicz
Mitral valvuloplasty with sutures used for aortic prosthesis implantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 1073 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. L. Yun, C. F. Sintek, D. C. Miller, G. T. Schuyler, A. D. Fletcher, T. A. Pfeffer, G. S. Kochamba, S. Khonsari, and M. R. Zile
Randomized Trial of Partial Versus Complete Chordal Preservation Methods of Mitral Valve Replacement : A Preliminary Report
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(90002): II-90 - II-94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
R. A. Cesnjevar, R. Feyrer, F. Walther, F. O. Mahmoud, Y. Lindemann, and J. von der Emde
High-risk mitral valve replacement in severe pulmonary hypertension--30 years experience
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 1998; 13(4): 344 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. F. O. Tyers
Mitral valve replacement: What should be the standard technique?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1990; 49(6): 861 - 862.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.