HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Craver, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Craver, J. M.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 49, 746-752, Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Aortic valve debridement by ultrasonic surgical aspirator: a word of caution

JM Craver
Division of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Aortic stenosis was relieved in 11 patients by ultrasonic debridement of the valve and annulus, while 102 other patients underwent valve replacement for aortic stenosis during 1988. Debridement was selectively applied based on findings of small annulus size (19 mm or less) and extensive calcification. Additional patient characteristics were mean transvalvular gradient of 78 mm Hg, advanced age, and marked left ventricular hypertrophy. Six patients had no residual gradient and 5 others a mean gradient less than 10 mm Hg. There were no complications related to the debridement process. Intraoperative transesophageal Doppler echocardiography demonstrated improved leaflet mobility and elimination of the gradient in all patients and elimination of associated valvular insufficiency in 2 patients. Follow- up echocardiography demonstrated late onset of new valvular regurgitation in 5 patients that was progressive and required reoperation in 3. Thickened, hardened, and retracted valve leaflets with loss of central coaptation were found in all 3 patients who underwent reoperation. Ultrasonic debridement can effectively relieve aortic stenosis, provide an excellent immediate hemodynamic result, and decrease operative time. However, the early occurrence of aortic insufficiency in a high percentage of patients makes it an unacceptable alternative to valve replacement, and the technique should be abandoned as a treatment for severe calcific aortic stenosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Mihaljevic, M. R. Sayeed, S. C. Stamou, and S. Paul Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Disease Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 825 - 840. [Full Text]

				D. L.-M. Wiegand Advances in Cardiac Surgery: Valve Repair Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2003; 23(2): 72 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Ghosh Ultrasonic Devices in Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1999; 7(4): 333 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Weinschelbaum, P. Stutzbach, M. Oliva, J. Zaidman, A. Torino, and E. Gabe MANUAL DEBRIDEMENT OF THE AORTIC VALVE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1999; 117(6): 1157 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Bernal, M. Fernandez-Vals, J. M. Rabasa, F. Gutierrez-Garcia, C. Morales, and J. M. Revuelta Repair of nonsevere rheumatic aortic valve disease during other valvular procedures: Is it safe? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1998; 115(5): 1130 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Fiore, M. T. Swartz, K. S. Naunheim, D. A. Moroney, D. A. Canvasser, L. R. McBride, P. S. Peigh, G. C. Kaiser, and V. L. Willman Management of Asymptomatic Mild Aortic Stenosis During Coronary Artery Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1693 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text]