| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 49, 370-383, Copyright © 1990 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
EL Jones, WS Weintraub, JM Craver, RA Guyton, CL Cohen, VE Corrigan and CR Hatcher Jr
The porcine bioprosthetic valve was used in 440 patients having isolated
mitral valve replacement (MVR), 522 patients having isolated aortic valve
replacement (AVR), and 88 patients having MVR + AVR between 1974 and 1981.
Patients with associated surgical procedures were excluded. Mean follow-up
was 8.3 years. At 10 years, there was no difference in patient survival
between those having AVR and those having MVR. Reoperations were performed
on 192 patients. Endocarditis was the reason for reoperation in 3.7% of
patients who had MVR and 10.6% of those who had AVR. Structural valve
degeneration was the reason for reoperation in 89.7% of MVR patients and
78.8% of AVR patients (p = 0.04). Hospital mortality among patients having
valve reoperations was 4.7%. At 10 years, the freedom from valve
reoperation for all causes and from structural valve degeneration was
significantly better for the AVR group than the MVR group (74% +/- 3%
versus 61% +/- 4%, p = 0.004; and 79% +/- 3% versus 63% +/- 4%, p = 0.0006,
respectively). For patients in their 60s, the 10-year freedom from
reoperation was 92% +/- 2% for AVR and 80% +/- 6% for MVR (p = not
significant). At 10 years, freedom from cardiac-related death and valve
reoperation was best for both MVR and AVR patients in their 60s. Patients
70 years old or older rarely had reoperation but died before valve failure
occurred. The 10-year freedom from all major valve- related events
(cardiac-related death, reoperation, thromboembolism, endocarditis, and
anticoagulant-related bleeding) was practically the same for both MVR and
AVR patients (48% +/- 3% versus 49% +/- 3%, respectively). The porcine
bioprosthetic valve is the valve of choice only for patients 60 years old
or older. Patients in their 70s have an extremely low rate of reoperation
but a high rate of cardiac-related death and do not outlive the prostheses.
ARTICLES
Ten-year experience with the porcine bioprosthetic valve: interrelationship of valve survival and patient survival in 1,050 valve replacements
Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F.-C. Riess, R. Bader, E. Cramer, L. Hansen, B. Kleijnen, G. Wahl, J. Wallrath, S. Winkel, and N. Bleese Hemodynamic Performance of the Medtronic Mosaic Porcine Bioprosthesis Up to Ten Years Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1310 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Prasongsukarn, W. E. Jamieson, E. Germann, F. Chan, and S. V Lichtenstein Aortic and Mitral Prosthetic Valve Replacement in Age Groups 61 65 & 66 70 Years Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ruel, A. Kulik, F. D. Rubens, P. Bedard, R. G. Masters, A. L. Pipe, and T. G. Mesana Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 364 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Khan, A. Trento, M. DeRobertis, R. M. Kass, M. Sandhu, L. S. C. Czer, C. Blanche, S. Raissi, G. P. Fontana, W. Cheng, et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 257 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Westaby, M. Horton, X. Y. Jin, T. Katsumata, O. Ahmed, S. Saito, H.-H. Li, and G. L. Grunkemeier Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 785 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Zellner, J. M. Kratz, A. J. Crumbley III, M. R. Stroud, S. M. Bradley, R. M. Sade, and F. A. Crawford Jr Long-term experience with the St. Jude medical valve prosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1210 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Logeais, T. Langanay, A. Leguerrier, C. Rioux, J. Chaperon, and M.-B. Coutte Aortic Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: a 12-year experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 68(2): 421 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. G. Paez and E. Jorge-Herrero Assessment of Pericardium in Cardiac Bioprostheses: A Review J Biomater Appl, April 1, 1999; 13(4): 351 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Yamak, B. Mavitas, A. Saritas, S F. Katircioglu, A T. Ulus, L. Birincioglu, Y H. Karagoz, E. Sener, O. Tasdemir, and K. Bayazit Ten-Year Results With Liotta Porcine Bioprostheses in the Mitral Position Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 1998; 6(4): 260 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. U. Myken, Håk. E. Berggren, S. Larsson, B. Roberts, I. Wallentin, and K. Caidahl LONG-TERM DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC RESULTS OF AORTIC OR MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH BIOCOR PORCINE BIOPROSTHESIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1998; 116(4): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. F. Katircioglu, B. Yamak, T. Ulus, L. Birincioglu, A. Saritas, O. Tasdemir, and K. Bayazit Mitral Valve Replacement with Bioprosthesis in Age Group Fifty to Sixty-Five Years Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 1998; 6(1): 23 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Fann, D. C. Miller, KathleenA. Moore, R. S. Mitchell, P. E. Oyer, E. B. Stinson, R. C. Robbins, B. A. Reitz, and N. E. Shumway Twenty-Year Clinical Experience With Porcine Bioprostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1301 - 1311. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Vongpatanasin, L. D. Hillis, and R. A. Lange Prosthetic Heart Valves N. Engl. J. Med., August 8, 1996; 335(6): 407 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. Fiore, M. T. Swartz, K. S. Naunheim, D. A. Moroney, D. A. Canvasser, L. R. McBride, P. S. Peigh, G. C. Kaiser, and V. L. Willman Management of Asymptomatic Mild Aortic Stenosis During Coronary Artery Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1693 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. E. Jamieson, A. I. Munro, R. T. Miyagishima, P. Allen, L. H. Burr, and G. F. O. Tyers Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Clinical Performance to Seventeen Years Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1995; 60(4): 999 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Cosgrove, B. W. Lytle, P. C. Taylor, M. T. Camacho, R. W. Stewart, P. M. McCarthy, D. P. Miller, M. R. Piedmonte, and F. D. Loop The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Ten-year results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1995; 110(3): 651 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Orszulak, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, B. J. Anderson, D. M. Ilstrup, F. J. Puga, and G. K. Danielson Risk of Thromboembolism With the Aortic Carpentier-Edwards Bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1995; 59(2): 462 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Aoyagi, A. Oryoji, Y. Nishi, K. Tanaka, K. Kosuga, and K. Oishi Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1994; 108(6): 1021 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. L. Grunkemeier, W. R. Eric Jamieson, D. C. Miller, and A. Starr Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1994; 108(4): 709 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Glower, W. D. White, A. C. Hatton, L. R. Smith, W. G. Young, W. G. Wolfe, and J. E. Lowe Determinants of reoperation after 960 valve replacements with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 381 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Hammermeister, G. K. Sethi, W. G. Henderson, C. Oprian, T. Kim, S. Rahimtoola, and The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or Bioprosthesis N. Engl. J. Med., May 6, 1993; 328(18): 1289 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
