ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. A.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 48, 597-599, Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Gotthard Bulau and closed water-seal drainage for empyema, 1875-1891

JA Meyer
Department of Surgery, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse.

Optimal treatment of pleural empyema remains controversial to the present day. In the preantibiotic era, surgical thinking favored early and aggressive drainage of closed-space infections, but the dynamics of the pleural space were poorly understood and open pneumothorax generally was considered the necessary price of surgical drainage. Against bitter opposition, revision of the dogma of early open drainage was achieved in 1918 by Evarts Graham and his associates on the US Army's Empyema Commission. Unacceptable mortality rates for early drainage were brought under control through a treatment program of repeated tapping, with surgical drainage only after loculation had occurred. Paradoxically, closed water-seal drainage for empyema had been used by a German internist, Gotthard Bulau, as early as 1875. His technique was published in 1891, 27 years before the report of the Empyema Commission. As a closed system, it would have been suited to empyema drainage in either the early diffuse or the loculated stages. Thoracotomy was not possible at the time, and Bulau probably could not foresee the future importance of his method to surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. Mattioli, R. G. Berrisford, M. L. Lugaresi, and B. Aramini
Survey on chest drainage systems adopted in Europe
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2008; 7(6): 1155 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C W H Davies, F V Gleeson, and R J O Davies
BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(90002): ii18 - 28.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E. Jadczuk
Postpneumonectomy empyema
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 1999; 14(2): 123 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. E. Van Schil and E. R. Munnell
Thoracic Drainage and the Contribution of Gotthard Bulau
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1876 - 1876.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.