ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, H.
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, S.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 48, 376-380, Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Longevity of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for superior vena cava

H Masuda, T Ogata, K Kikuchi and S Tanaka
Second Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.

We previously reported that the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft for superior vena cava (SVC) substitution presents the problems of flexion and kinking when the graft is long. We therefore replaced the SVC of dogs with two types of prosthetic substitutes, ePTFE (Gore-Tex) and spiral-supported ePTFE (Im/praflex), and evaluated the long-term patency of the prosthetic substitutes. Total replacement of the SVC was performed in 9 adult mongrel dogs. The substitutes were ePTFE and spiral-supported ePTFE in 5 and 4 dogs, respectively. The animals were killed about 3 years after replacement of the SVC, and the harvested specimens were histologically examined by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Evaluation of ePTFE revealed late occlusion in 1 of 5 dogs. The spiral-supported ePTFE showed patency in all dogs. In the group with ePTFE grafts, light microscopic examination revealed abnormalities of endothelial cells, granulation, and necrosis. There was no hyperplasia of the subendothelial connective tissue near the center. In the animals with spiral-supported ePTFE grafts, the subendothelial connective tissue showed favorable growth even in the center of the reconstructed site. There was no granulation in the spiral-supported ePTFE group. Scanning electron microscopic examination in the ePTFE group showed that endothelial cells were spindle-shaped and had an irregular surface. The spiral-supported ePTFE group showed an almost regular form of endothelial cells and no abnormalities except for the slightly spindled shape in the center. Therefore, we recommend that spiral-supported ePTFE should be used as an SVC substitute in clinical situations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. Wells, M. Malas, C. J. Baker, S. M. Quardt, and M. L. Barr
Depopulated vena caval homograft: a new venous conduit
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 498 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. H. Warren, W. J. Piccione Jr, and L. P. Faber
Superior Vena Caval Reconstruction Using Autologous Pericardium
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1998; 66(1): 291 - 292.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1989 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.