HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heydorn, W. H. Articles by Berry, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heydorn, W. H. Articles by Berry, W. R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 46, 567-569, Copyright © 1988 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Pericardial substitutes: a survey

WH Heydorn, VA Ferraris and WR Berry
Department of Surgery, Letterman Army Medical Center, Presidio of San Francisco, CA 94129-6700.

Many thoracic surgeons have used pericardial substitutes to reduce the risk of reoperation, but there have been few reports of these procedures. Therefore, we used a questionnaire to gather information on experience with use of pericardial substitutes and to document the findings at reoperation. A six-question survey was sent to 2,344 members of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, requesting surgeons to list their experience with pericardial substitutes and at reoperation in patients with these substitutes in place. Of the 634 surgeons who responded to the survey, 120 reported the insertion of 3,828 pericardial substitutes. Two hundred thirty-six reoperations were reported by 89 surgeons. None of the pericardial substitutes was reported to be completely successful in facilitating reoperation. The experience with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) pericardial substitutes was reported to be significantly more satisfactory than that with all other substitutes (p = 0.0004 by chi-square analysis), but 14% of surgeons who used PTFE said they were dissatisfied at reoperation. Based on the results of this survey, we suggest caution, careful documentation, and long-term follow-up studies before widespread use of pericardial substitutes can be recommended.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Naito, T. Shin'oka, N. Hibino, G. Matsumura, and H. Kurosawa A novel method to reduce pericardial adhesion: A combination technique with hyaluronic acid biocompatible membrane. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2008; 135(4): 850 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Leprince, M. Rahmati, N. Bonnet, V. Bors, A. Rama, Ph. Leger, I. Gandjbakhch, and A. Pavie Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes to wrap surfaces of circulatory support devices in patients undergoing bridge to heart transplantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 19(3): 302 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Rao, M. Komeda, R. D. Weisel, G. Cohen, M. A. Borger, and T. E. David Should the pericardium be closed routinely after heart operations? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1999; 67(2): 484 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Jacobs, R. S. Iyer, J. S. Weston, J. J. Amato, M. J. Elliott, M. R. de Leval, and J. Stark Expanded PTFE Membrane to Prevent Cardiac Injury During Resternotomy for Congenital Heart Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1996; 62(6): 1778 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Blanche and A. Santibanez-Gallerani Technique to Protect the Internal Mammary Artery Pedicle Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1824 - 1825. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. J. J. J. C. Bogers Massive bleeding at resternotomy despite a polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1995; 110(1): 274 - 275. [Full Text]