HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Fred H. Edwards Robert A. Albus Rostik Zajtchuk Geoffrey M. Graeber Michael J. Barry John D. Rumisek Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Edwards, F. H. Articles by Arishita, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Edwards, F. H. Articles by Arishita, G.

Ann Thorac Surg 1988;45:437-440
© 1988 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Use of a Bayesian statistical model for risk assessment in coronary artery surgery

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the Division of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC, USA

Accepted for publication November 17, 1987.

^_* Address reprint requests to Dr. Edwards, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001.

A computerized statistical model based on the theorem of Bayes was developed to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. From January, 1984, to April, 1987, at our hospital, 700 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. The presence or absence of 20 risk factors was determined for each patient. The first 300 patients formed the initial database of the Bayesian predictive model, and the remaining 400 patients were prospectively evaluated in four groups of 100 each. Each group was prospectively evaluated and then incorporated into the database to update the model. There was good agreement between predicted and observed results. Bayesian theory is particularly suited to this task because it (1) accommodates multiple risk factors, (2) is tailored to one's specific practice, (3) determines individual, rather than group, prognosis, and (4) can be updated with time to compensate for a changing patient population. These flexible attributes are especially valuable in light of recent changes in the coronary artery bypass graft patient profile.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Furnary, Y. Wu, L. F. Hiratzka, G. L. Grunkemeier, and U. S. Page 3rd Aprotinin Does Not Increase the Risk of Renal Failure in Cardiac Surgery Patients Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-127 - I-133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Jin, L. F. Hiratzka, G. L. Grunkemeier, A. Krause, and U. S. Page III Aborted Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Patients Have Much Worse Outcomes Than On-Pump or Successful Off-Pump Patients Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-332 - I-337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Z. Omar, G. Ambler, P. Royston, J. Eliahoo, and K. M. Taylor Cardiac surgery risk modeling for mortality: a review of current practice and suggestions for improvement Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2232 - 2237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Kurki, O. Jarvinen, M. J. Kataja, J. Laurikka, and M. Tarkka Performance of three preoperative risk indices; CABDEAL, EuroSCORE and Cleveland models in a prospective coronary bypass database Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2002; 21(3): 406 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Lippmann and D. M. Shahian Coronary Artery Bypass Risk Prediction Using Neural Networks Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1997; 63(6): 1635 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. K. Orr Use of a Probabilistic Neural Network to Estimate the Risk of Mortality after Cardiac Surgery Med Decis Making, April 1, 1997; 17(2): 178 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. S. O. Kurki and M. Kataja Preoperative Prediction of Postoperative Morbidity in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1996; 61(6): 1740 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. H. Edwards, R. A. Albus, R. Zajtchuk, G. M. Graeber, M. J. Barry, J. D. Rumisek, and G. Arishita Use of a Bayesian statistical model for risk assessment in coronary artery surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1995; 59(6): 1611 - 1612. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Daley Criteria by which to evaluate risk-adjusted outcomes programs in cardiac surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1994; 58(6): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Marshall, A. L. W. Shroyer, F. L. Grover, and K. E. Hammermeister Bayesian-logit model for risk assessment in coronary artery bypass grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1994; 57(6): 1492 - 1500. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Clark The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database status report Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1994; 57(1): 20 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Miller More attempts to monitor quality assurance for myocardial revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1989; 47(5): 641 - 642. [PDF]

				F. H. Edwards, R. A. Albus, R. Zajtchuk, G. M. Graeber, and M. Barry A quality assurance model of operative mortality in coronary artery surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1989; 47(5): 646 - 649. [Abstract] [PDF]