HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Antunes, M. L. Articles by Bigger, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Antunes, M. L. Articles by Bigger, J. T., Jr

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 45, 315-318, Copyright © 1988 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Effect of electrophysiological testing on ejection fraction during cardioverter/defibrillator implantation

ML Antunes, HM Spotnitz, FD Livelli Jr, JS Steinberg and JT Bigger Jr
Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

To evaluate the effect of repeated induction of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, or both, in patients with poor left ventricular function, we performed intraoperative two-dimensional echocardiography in 6 patients undergoing implantation of the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in sinus rhythm were assessed before the first inducible ventricular arrhythmia and after a mean of 6 +/- 1.9 (SD) episodes of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. During the procedure no significant change in mean ejection fraction was observed (28 +/- 14 versus 27 +/- 17%). Only 1 of the 6 patients studied had a change in ejection fraction greater than 3% (a decrease from 20 to 11%). In an overall clinical series of 38 primary implants or generator changes (including electrophysiological testing) in 29 patients, 1 patient recovered after postoperative inotropic support and 1 died of acute postoperative ischemic heart failure. We conclude that ventricular arrhythmias induced during automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator implantation have no immediate deleterious effects on ejection fraction in most patients with compromised left ventricular function and without ongoing ischemia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. G. Rabkin, S. E. Cabreriza, J. C. LaCorte, A. D. Weinberg, L. Coku, R. Walsh, R. Mosca, and H. M. Spotnitz Sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibition preserves ventricular function after ventricular fibrillation in the intact swine heart J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1499 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Strickberger, E. G. Daoud, T. Davidson, R. Weiss, F. Bogun, B. P. Knight, M. Bahu, R. Goyal, K. C. Man, and F. Morady Probability of Successful Defibrillation at Multiples of the Defibrillation Energy Requirement in Patients With an Implantable Defibrillator Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1217 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. D. Swerdlow, C. T. Peter, R. M. Kass, E. S. Gang, W. J. Mandel, C. Hwang, D. J. Martin, and P.-S. Chen Programming of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators on the Basis of the Upper Limit of Vulnerability Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1497 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Manolis, H. Rastegar, and N. A. M. Estes III Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Current Status JAMA, September 8, 1989; 262(10): 1362 - 1368. [Abstract] [PDF]