HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gallo, I. Articles by Artinano, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gallo, I. Articles by Artinano, E.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 45, 66-70, Copyright © 1988 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Incidence of primary tissue valve failure in porcine bioprosthetic heart valves

I Gallo, F Nistal, R Blasquez, E Arbe and E Artinano
Servicio de Cirugia Cardiovascular, Hospital Nacional Marques de Valdecilla, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.

This report provides retrospective follow-up data on 324 consecutive patients who received a Hancock-I porcine valve in the aortic or the mitral position, or in both positions, between June, 1974, and December, 1976. This analysis included 319 valves (193 mitral, 126 aortic) available for study of the incidence of primary tissue valve failure after 10 to 12.5 years of follow-up. Of the 319 prostheses at risk, 114 instances of primary tissue valve failure occurred. Seventy- three of the failed valves were in the mitral position, and 41 were in the aortic position. The calculated actuarial probability of freedom from primary tissue valve failure was 52 +/- 5% for the mitral and 58 +/- 6% for the aortic prostheses at 12.5 years of follow-up. For patients older than 40 years at the time of operation, the rate of freedom from primary failure was 68 +/- 8% and 55 +/- 6% for aortic and mitral prostheses, respectively, at 12.5 years. Comparison of both actuarial curves disclosed no meaningful difference. However, a tendency toward greater failure rate was observed in the mitral prosthesis group.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. S. Geha, M. G. Massad, and N. J. Snow Replacement of degenerated mitral and aortic bioprostheses without explantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1509 - 1514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Machida, H. Ishibashi-Ueda, K. Nakano, Y. Sasako, J. Kobayashi, K. Bando, K. Minatoya, H. Imamura, and S. Kitamura A morphologic study of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2001; 122(4): 649 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Safi, D. C. Iliopoulos, and D. S. Duff Repeat Replacement of Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1995; 59(5): 1217 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text]