ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Matti Tarkka
Risto Pokela
Martti Lepojärvi
Juha Nissinen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kärkölä, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kärkölä, P.

Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:508-513
© 1987 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Infection Prophylaxis in Pulmonary Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study

Matti Tarkka, M.D.*, Risto Pokela, M.D., Martti Lepojärvi, M.D., Juha Nissinen, M.D., Pentti Kärkölä, M.D.

From the Department of Surgery, Oulu University Central Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Accepted for publication April 22, 1987.

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Tarkka, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Central Hospital, SF-90220 Oulu, Finland

A prospective randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis against postoperative infections was carried out on 120 patients undergoing pulmonary operations. The patients were randomized into two groups of 60 patients each. One group received doxycycline (deoxytetracycline) prophylaxis for five days, and the other received cefuroxime (a second-generation cephalosporin) for one day. The groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, common risk factors, diagnosis, and operative procedures.

A reduction in the infection rate was noted in the cefuroxime group (10/60) compared with the doxycycline group (19/60), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.055). In major infections (empyema and pneumonia) there was no difference between the groups (4/60 in the cefuroxime group and 5/60 in the doxycycline group), but a significant (p < 0.05) reduction was noted in minor infections (6/56 and 14/55, respectively) such as lower respiratory tract infections and prolonged fever. There were no wound infections in the two study groups. There were significantly (p < 0.05) fewer postoperative fever reactions (axillary temperature > 37.5°C) in the cefuroxime group (30/60) compared with the doxycycline group (44/60).

Both antibiotics were effective in preventing wound infections, but cefuroxime may also be beneficial in preventing minor respiratory infections. The bactericidal effect of cefuroxime may explain this finding.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
X. B. D'Journo, J. M. Rolain, C. Doddoli, D. Raoult, and P. A. Thomas
Airways colonizations in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, August 1, 2011; 40(2): 309 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
O. Schussler, M. Alifano, H. Dermine, S. Strano, A. Casetta, S. Sepulveda, A. Chafik, S. Coignard, A. Rabbat, and J.-F. Regnard
Postoperative Pneumonia after Major Lung Resection
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2006; 173(10): 1161 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. N. Nan, M. Fernandez-Ayala, C. Farinas-Alvarez, R. Mons, F. J. Ortega, J. Gonzalez-Macias, and M. C. Farinas
Nosocomial Infection After Lung Surgery: Incidence and Risk Factors
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2647 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
M. Sok, A. Z. Dragas, J. Erzen, and J. Jerman
Sources of pathogens causing pleuropulmonary infections after lung cancer resection
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2002; 22(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Boldt, S. Piper, D. Uphus, R. Fussle, and G. Hempelmann
Preoperative microbiologic screening and antibiotic prophylaxis in pulmonary resection operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1999; 68(1): 208 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Bernard, M. Pillet, P. Goudet, and H. Viard
Antibiotic prophylaxis in pulmonary surgeryA prospective randomized double-blind trial of flash cefuroxime versus forty-eight-hour cefuroxime
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1994; 107(3): 896 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Olak, K. Jeyasingham, C. Forrester-Wood, J. Hutter, M. Al-Zeerah, and E. Brown
Randomized trial of one-dose versus six-dose cefazolin prophylaxis in elective general thoracic surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1991; 51(6): 956 - 958.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1987 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.