HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): William O. Myers Bernard J. Gersh David R. Holmes Hartzell V. Schaff Thomas J. Ryan George C. Kaiser Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Myers, W. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Myers, W. O.

Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:471-486
© 1987 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Medical versus Early Surgical Therapy in Patients with Triple-Vessel Disease and Mild Angina Pectoris: A CASS Registry Study of Survival

^* Address reprint requests to Dr. Myers, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 North Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449

Results of coronary artery bypass grafting were evaluated in 856 nonrandomized patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry with mild angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classes I and II) and three-vessel disease, defined as 70% or more stenosis in the proximal or middle segment of the three major coronary arteries. There were 413 patients with medical therapy and 443 with early operation. Patients with delayed operation were kept in the medical group for analysis. Six-year survival adjusted for left ventricular (LV) function and number of proximal stenoses was 67% for medical and 84% for surgical patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with normal LV function had equal survival with medicine or surgical intervention. Those with mild or moderate LV dysfunction (CASS LV wall motion score 6 to 9 and 10 to 15, respectively) and at least one proximal stenosis (the dominant right coronary artery) had increased probability of being alive at six years with surgical treatment. In patients with severe LV impairment (LV score higher than 15) and in those whose only proximal stenosis of 70% or more (in three-vessel disease) was located in the left anterior descending coronary artery, increased survival with surgical treatment could not be demonstrated. This is a nonrandomized observational study with the limitations of such studies: the need to adjust for differences in baseline traits between medical and surgical groups and the possibility of an unrecognized imbalance in baseline characteristics.

In a Cox analysis of variables influencing outcome, early surgical treatment was an independent predictor of survival with 43% the risk of medical treatment (95% confidence range: 29 to 62%). Adjustment by propensity analysis to reduce selection bias from known differences in baseline variables did not alter results.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. H. Lopes, F. d. S. Paulitsch, A. F. Gois, A. C. Pereira, N. A. Stolf, L. O. Dallan, J. A. F. Ramires, and W. A. Hueb Impact of number of vessels disease on outcome of patients with stable coronary artery disease: 5-year follow-up of the Medical, Angioplasty, and bypass Surgery Study (MASS) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2008; 33(3): 349 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Hueb, P. R. Soares, B. J. Gersh, L. A. M. Cesar, P. L. Luz, L. B. Puig, E. M. Martinez, S. A. Oliveira, and J. A. F. Ramires The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: One-year results J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1743 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. W. Lytle The role of coronary revascularization in the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(90060): S2 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. S. Weintraub, S. D. Clements Jr, L. V.-T. Crisco, R. A. Guyton, J. M. Craver, E. L. Jones, and C. R. Hatcher Jr Twenty-Year Survival After Coronary Artery Surgery: An Institutional Perspective From Emory University Circulation, March 11, 2003; 107(9): 1271 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kabakci, O. Onalan, M. Kemal Batur, A. Yildirir, R. Cagrikul, T. Acil, L. Tokgozoglu, A. Oto, F. Ozmen, and S. Kes What is the Optimal Evaluation Time of the QT Dispersion After Acute Myocardial Infarction for the Risk Stratification? Angiology, July 1, 2001; 52(7): 463 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. D. Loop Coronary artery surgery: the end of the beginning Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, December 1, 1998; 14(6): 554 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Cox and C. D. Naylor The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading Scale for Angina Pectoris: Is It Time for Refinements? Ann Intern Med, October 15, 1992; 117(8): 677 - 683. [Abstract] [PDF]