HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Lawrence J. Pass Aaron S. Estrera Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pass, L. J. Articles by Estrera, A. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pass, L. J. Articles by Estrera, A. S.

Ann Thorac Surg 1987;44:253-256
© 1987 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Management of Esophageal Gunshot Wounds

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Southwestern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX

Accepted for publication January 15, 1987.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr. Pass, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235–9031.

The records of 20 patients with gunshot wounds of the esophagus seen from 1973 through 1985 were reviewed. Nine perforations were cervical, 10 were thoracic, and 1 was abdominal. Because physical findings and plain roentgenograms lack specificity, a high index of suspicion based on the path of the bullet tract is essential for early diagnosis. Esophageal injury should especially be suspected when the bullet wound is transcervical or transmediastinal.

Perforation was diagnosed by esophagoscopy in 9 patients, esophagography in 4, and surgical exploration in 7. Mean time from admission to operation was 3.8 hours. Associated injuries occurred frequently. Eighteen patients were treated by primary closure and wide drainage, and 2 were managed by esophageal exclusion. There were 2 perioperative deaths, both in patients with associated aortic injuries, and 1 late death, for an overall mortality of 15%. There was one postoperative leak following a cervical repair. No leaks occurred in patients having a thoracic repair.

The findings indicate that esophageal perforation must be sought by a variety of methods. With prompt diagnosis and early operation, primary repair can be safely accomplished. When sepsis from esophageal leak is avoided, mortality and major morbidity are related to associated injuries.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Zwischenberger, C. Savage, and A. Bidani Surgical Aspects of Esophageal Disease . Perforation and Caustic Injury Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2002; 165(8): 1037 - 1040. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. W Dupont Anesthesia for Esophageal Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2000; 4(1): 2 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Ilic, A. Petricevic, Z. Mimica, S. Tanfara, and N. F. Ilic War injuries to the thoracic esophagus Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, December 1, 1998; 14(6): 572 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]