HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pearson, F. G. Articles by Prakash, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pearson, F. G. Articles by Prakash, D.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 43, 241-244, Copyright © 1987 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Peptic ulcer in acquired columnar-lined esophagus: results of surgical treatment

FG Pearson, JD Cooper, GA Patterson and D Prakash

Ulcerative peptic esophagitis may lead to the progressive replacement of squamous by columnar epithelium in the distal esophagus. A typical peptic ulcer (Barrett's ulcer) may develop in the columnar-lined segment, although this is a rare occurrence. Between 1975 and 1985 at Toronto General Hospital we treated 11 patients with penetrating peptic ulcer and acquired, columnar-lined esophagus. Presenting symptoms related to the ulcer were precordial and lower dorsal back pain in 4 patients, dysphagia in 6, and massive hemorrhage of the upper gastrointestinal tract in 4. None of the ulcers healed following a trial of medical therapy, and ultimately all 11 patients underwent antireflux procedures (gastroplasty and partial fundoplication). There was one operative death. Complete healing of the ulcer was observed in the 8 patients who underwent follow-up endoscopy between two and five months after operation. There has been no recurrence of symptoms resulting from ulcer in subsequent follow-up, which extends from 1 to 11 years (mean, 5 years). Adenocarcinoma developed in the columnar- lined segment in 2 of the 11 patients, which was diagnosed at 32 and 91 months following operation, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Nigro, R. M. Bremner, C. B. Fuller, J. Theisen, Y. Ma, and V. A. Starnes Perforating Barrett's ulcer resulting in a life-threatening esophagobronchial fistula Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 302 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Little Barrett's Esophagus Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1996; 62(1): 315 - 315. [Full Text]

				M. L. McDonald, V. F. Trastek, M. S. Allen, C. Deschamps, and P. C. Pairolero BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS: DOES AN ANTIREFLUX PROCEDURE REDUCE THE NEED FOR ENDOSCOPIC SURVEILLANCE? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1996; 111(6): 1135 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text]