HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bladergroen, M. R. Articles by Postlethwait, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bladergroen, M. R. Articles by Postlethwait, R. W.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 42, 235-239, Copyright © 1986 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture

MR Bladergroen, JE Lowe and RW Postlethwait

Over the past 47 years (1937 to 1984), a total of 127 patients with esophageal perforation or rupture were evaluated at Duke Medical Center or the Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center. In 13 patients, the diagnosis was established at the time of autopsy and in the remaining 114, the diagnosis was established clinically. The etiology, radiological findings, underlying esophageal disease, time interval between onset of symptoms and therapy, and eventual outcome were evaluated. Patients with anastomotic leaks and those in whom carcinoma resulted in perforation or fistula were excluded. Iatrogenic causes were responsible for 55% of perforations, followed by spontaneous rupture in 15%, foreign body perforation in 14%, and traumatic perforation in 10%. Of the 127 patients, 114 underwent treatment involving primary closure (43%), drainage alone (28%), resection (9%), or nonoperative therapy (20%). The overall mortality among these 114 patients was 21%. Fourteen patients sustained a major complication requiring additional operative intervention. The overall mortality among patients requiring reoperation was 57%. Survival was significantly influenced by a delay in treatment of greater than 24 hours. With the exception of nonoperative therapy, survival was improved for all forms of treatment instituted within 24 hours. Primary closure within 24 hours resulted in the most favorable outcome (92% survival). In addition to early treatment, other factors associated with a favorable outcome included traumatic perforation (100% survival), foreign-body perforations (94% survival), and iatrogenic causes (80% survival). Spontaneous rupture resulted in the lowest survival (37%). The incidence of esophageal perforation has increased dramatically since 1967.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Sinha Naclerio's V Sign Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 296 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fischer, O. Thomusch, S. Benz, E. von Dobschuetz, P. Baier, and U. T. Hopt Nonoperative Treatment of 15 Benign Esophageal Perforations With Self-Expandable Covered Metal Stents Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 467 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Demirbag, T. Tiryaki, C. Atabek, I. Surer, H. Ozturk, and S. Cetinkursun Conservative Approach to the Mediastinitis in Childhood Secondary to Esophageal Perforation Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2005; 44(2): 131 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Brinster, S. Singhal, L. Lee, M. B. Marshall, L. R. Kaiser, and J. C. Kucharczuk Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1475 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Nabili and J R Murdoch A case of Boerhaave's syndrome associated with raised intraocular pressure Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2003; 87(5): 650 - 651. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gimenez, T. Franquet, J. J. Erasmus, S. Martinez, and P. Estrada Thoracic Complications of Esophageal Disorders RadioGraphics, October 1, 2002; 22(90001): S247 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Chen, T.-J. Huang, Y.-J. Chen, H.-P. Liu, and R. W.-W. Hsu Flexion-Distraction Injury of the Upper Thoracic Spine Associated with Tracheoesophageal Perforation : A Case Report J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2002; 84(6): 1028 - 1031. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. W Dupont Anesthesia for Esophageal Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2000; 4(1): 2 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. P. Davies and R. Vaughan Expanding mesh stent in the emergency treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 67(5): 1482 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Weber, M. J. Schurr, and J. R. Pellett Delayed Presentation of a Tracheoesophageal Fistula After Blunt Chest Trauma Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1996; 62(6): 1850 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. Wang, A. J. Razzouk, A. Safavi, K. Gan, G. S. Van Arsdell, P. M. Burton, B. L. Fandrich, M. J. Wood, A. C. Hill, E. E. Vyhmeister, et al. DELAYED PRIMARY REPAIR OF INTRATHORACIC ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION: IS IT SAFE? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1996; 111(1): 114 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text]