ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shahian, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shahian, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Watkins, E., Jr

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 41, 237-246, Copyright © 1986 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Transthoracic versus extrathoracic esophagectomy: mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival

DM Shahian, WB Neptune, FH Ellis Jr and E Watkins Jr

Extrathoracic esophagectomy for carcinoma is an acceptable substitute for transthoracic resection if it can be shown to have comparable or superior safety and no adverse effect on long-term survival. To test this hypothesis, we employed extrathoracic esophagectomy in 30 consecutive patients with carcinoma of the esophagus from January, 1978, to July, 1984. During this period, 65 comparable patients underwent transthoracic resection through a left thoracotomy for lower esophageal lesions or a right thoracotomy and laparotomy for upper thoracic lesions. Only patients with carcinoma limited to the gastric cardia were excluded from the study. Overall morbidity was higher in the extrathoracic than in the transthoracic group (13 of 30 or 43.3% versus 15 of 65 or 23.1%; p = 0.05), but the differences in hospital mortality (4 of 65 or 6.2% for the transthoracic group versus 4 of 30 or 13.3% for the extrathoracic group) and duration of hospital stay (17.4 +/- 11.7 days for the transthoracic group versus 20.5 +/- 13.4 days for the extrathoracic group) were not statistically significant. Considering all patients who either died or sustained a postoperative complication, we found significant differences favoring transthoracic resection in those subgroups of patients who were able to undergo primary reconstruction at the time of resection (12 of 57 or 21.1% versus 15 of 28 or 53.6%; p = 0.004), those with advanced Stage III lesions (11 of 47 or 23.4% versus 12 of 20 or 60%; p = 0.006), those with tumor of the lower esophagus (8 of 35 or 22.9% versus 6 of 10 or 60%; p = 0.04), and those with tumor that could be resected through a left thoracotomy (2 of 18 or 11.1% versus 17 of 30 or 56.7%; p = 0.002). Actuarial survival curves for all transthoracic and extrathoracic resections and separate analysis for Stage I and Stage III tumors revealed no statistically significant differences between these two techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S. Law, D. T. K. Suen, K.-H. Wong, K.-F. Kwok, and J. Wong
A Single-Layer, Continuous, Hand-Sewn Method for Esophageal Anastomosis: Prospective Evaluation in 218 Patients
Arch Surg, January 1, 2005; 140(1): 33 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. Hagen and T. R. DeMeester
Esophageal adenocarcinoma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 72(4): 1430 - 1432.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. H. Kim, K. S. Lee, Y. M. Shim, K. Kim, P. S. Yang, and T. S. Kim
Esophageal Resection: Indications, Techniques, and Radiologic Assessment
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1119 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. M. Gupta and N. M. Gupta
Transhiatal Versus Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Distal Esophageal Cancer
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2000; 8(4): 347 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. B. Jougon, M. Ballester, J. Duffy, J. Dubrez, C. Delaisement, J.-F. Velly, and L. Couraud
Esophagectomy for Cancer in the Patient Aged 70 Years and Older
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1423 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
W. T. Vigneswaran, V. F. Trastek, P. C. Pairolero, C. Deschamps, R. C. Daly, and M. S. Allen
Extended esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma of the upper thoracic esophagus
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1994; 107(3): 901 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
G. A. J. Gelfand, R. J. Finley, B. Nelems, R. Inculet, K. G. Evans, and G. Fradet
Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Cardia: Experience With 160 Cases
Arch Surg, October 1, 1992; 127(10): 1164 - 1168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
M. R. Moon, W. J. Schulte, G. B. Haasler, and R. E. Condon
Transhiatal and Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus
Arch Surg, August 1, 1992; 127(8): 951 - 955.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1986 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.