ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brahos, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fankhauser, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brahos, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fankhauser, D. J.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 40, 7-10, Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Aortocoronary bypass following unsuccessful PTCA: experience in 100 consecutive patients

GJ Brahos, NH Baker, HG Ewy, PJ Moore, JW Thomas, PM Sanfelippo, RF McVicker and DJ Fankhauser

This study reviews the experience in a community hospital with aortocoronary bypass in 100 consecutive patients following failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in terms of timing of intervention, morbidity, and mortality. Patients undergoing operation within 24 hours of PTCA are defined as the urgent group (68%) and those with intervention at greater than 24 hours, the elective group (32%). Mean interval from PTCA to operation was 43.5 days; among patients with apparently initially successful PTCA and hospital discharge, mean interval to operation was 138 days. Complete revascularization was carried out in all patients using standard techniques. Although the difference was not statistically significant, patients in the urgent group required intraaortic balloon pump support and inotropic infusions more often and experienced greater postoperative blood loss. Significant increases in the use of lidocaine and blood products were noted in the urgent group. The rates of major complications were 54.4% in the urgent group and 18.8% in the elective group. Mortality was 4.4% in the urgent group and 3.1% in the elective group (not significant); all deaths were cardiac related. There were no late deaths among survivors followed for 3 months to 4 years; 86% were in Functional Class I. We conclude that PTCA is a reasonable approach for some patients with ischemic heart disease. However, mandatory urgent aortocoronary bypass in these patients carries an increased morbidity and mortality, and patients should be selected with care.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. C. Silvestry and P. K. Smith
Current status of cardiac surgery in the abciximab-treated patient
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): S12 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Wang, S. R. Gundry, G. Van Arsdell, A. J. Razzouk, A. C. Hill, M. Sjolander, K. A. Cavazos, J. M. Brewer, E. E. Vyhmeister, and L. L. Bailey
Percurtaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty failures in patients with multivessel diseaseIs there an increased risk?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1995; 110(1): 214 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.