ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Denton A. Cooley
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frazier, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by Okereke, O. U. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frazier, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by Okereke, O. U. J.

Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:303-307
© 1985 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Cardiac Transplantation at the Texas Heart Institute: Comparative Analysis of Two Groups of Patients (1968–1969 and 1982–1983)

O.H. Frazier, M.D.*, Denton A. Cooley, M.D., G. Arnaud Painvin, M.D., Linda B. Chandler, R.N., O.U.J. Okereke, M.B. F.R.C.S.

Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Transplantation Unit, Texas Heart Institute of St. Luke's Episcopal and Texas Children's Hospitals, Houston, TX

Accepted for publication June 22, 1984.

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Frazier, Texas Heart Institute, PO Box 20345, Houston, TX 77225

Two groups of heart transplant recipients were studied. Patients in Group 1 underwent heart transplantation from May, 1968, to November, 1969. They were compared with Group 2, a series begun in July, 1982, when the current cardiac transplantation program was renewed at the Texas Heart Institute, and terminated in December, 1983.

Patient selection, management, and results were compared. With a cumulative follow-up of 64 patient-months (Group 1) versus 93 patient-months (Group 2), the actuarial 18-month survival was 0 in Group 1 versus 70% in Group 2.

Nine of the 18 patients in Group 1 died of rejection versus 4 of the 18 patients in Group 2. There were 6 infection-related deaths in Group 1 and none in Group 2. Using linearized rates based on 100 patient-months, the incidences of rejection and infection were, respectively, 23 versus 10.7 (p < 0.05) and 64 versus 34 (p < 0.05) between Groups 1 and 2. Incidence, pattern, and severity of these major complications have been reduced significantly. Over the last decade, there have been improvements in the selection of potential candidates, better management of donors, improved graft preservation, and the introduction of more selective immunosuppression.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. S. Sweeney, M. P. Macris, O. H. Frazier, J. T. Sinnott, M. Peric, and H. A. McAllister Jr
The Treatment of Advanced Cardiac Allograft Rejection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1988; 46(4): 378 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.