ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiavarelli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Marino, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiavarelli, M.
Right arrow Articles by Marino, B.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 39, 218-222, Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Interactions between pharmacological cardioplegia and hypothermia for intraoperative myocardial protection

M Chiavarelli, R Chiavarelli, A Carpi and B Marino

Cold cardioplegia is currently the method of choice for providing myocardial protection during open-heart surgical procedures. Two components of protection, perfusion cooling and pharmacological cardiac arrest, were investigated in the guinea pig heart-lung model. The effects of two cardioplegic solutions, the University of Alabama Hospital solution and the St. Thomas' Hospital solution, and a control perfusate were compared. The results confirmed the efficacy of hypothermia as a protective agent and the additional protection afforded by pharmacological cardioplegia. Infusion temperature critically influenced the cardioprotective action of the Alabama solution: Striking protection was afforded only under hypothermic conditions, whereas myocardial damage was exacerbated by the infusion at 37 degrees C. The St. Thomas' Hospital solution provided substantial protection independent of infusion temperature. Thus, the safety margin of the Alabama solution was narrower than that of the St. Thomas' solution. It is suggested that the difference between the two cardioplegic solutions partially depends on their coronary vasoactivity, since the administration of the Alabama solution at 37 degrees C increased coronary perfusion pressure. It would seem worthwhile to use a temperature-independent cardioplegic solution devoid of coronary vasoconstricting action.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1985 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.