ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nunley, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nunley, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Starr, A.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 37, 393-397, Copyright © 1984 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

The evolution of reparative techniques for the mitral valve

DL Nunley and A Starr

Forty-eight adult patients underwent mitral valve repair for nonischemic valvular incompetence between 1963 and 1981. Early in our experience, 21 individuals received wedge leaflet resection or leaflet plication with posteromedial commissural annuloplasty. More recently, midleaflet annuloplasty has been employed in 13 patients and is now our preferred technique. Operative mortality was 6.3%, and all deaths occurred prior to 1973. Eventually valve replacement was necessary in 10 patients; all replacements were done prior to 1977. Technical errors and progression of rheumatic disease each accounted for half of these replacements. Five-year survival by the life table method was 74 +/- 9% for the entire group. Survival at 5 years for patients with prolapsing leaflets was significantly better (87 +/- 7%) than for those with normal leaflet motion (46 +/- 14%). A residual postoperative murmur of mitral insufficiency correlated with the likelihood of subsequent valve replacement. Important technical aspects of valve repair are described, and criteria for optimal patient selection are discussed. The evolution of reparative methods has led to a better understanding and broader application of mitral valve reconstruction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Murtra
The adventure of cardiac surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 167 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
O. Isik, M. Balkanay, R. Zeybek, O. Bayezid, and C. Yakut
Clinical Results of Reconstructive Surgery of the Mitral Valve
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, October 1, 1991; 25(8): 595 - 606.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1984 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.