|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1983;36:444-452
© 1983 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and the Department of Anesthesia, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
* Address reprint requests to Dr. Roberts, Director of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Division of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610
Sixty patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft operation were prospectively randomized into one of six equal groups based on the intraoperative method of left ventricular venting and venous drainage. Group 1 had bicaval venous drainage without snaring and left ventricular venting through the superior pulmonary vein; Group 2, two-stage venous drainage and venting as in Group 1; Group 3, bicaval venous drainage without snaring and no left ventricular vent; Group 4, two-stage venous drainage and no left ventricular vent; Group 5, bicaval venous drainage without snaring and with ascending aortic venting through a catheter; and Group 6, two-stage venous drainage and venting as in Group 5. Left ventricular performance was determined by radionuclide ventriculography from which global ejection fraction and regional wall motion were determined. Cardiac output was obtained by the thermodilution technique. Myocardial temperature was assessed by a needle thermistor during aortic cross-clamping. Serial electrocardiograms and levels of myocardial-specific isoenzymes (serum CPK-MB) were also analyzed.
Each of the techniques tested was equally effective as determined by an analysis of intraoperative myocardial cooling and postoperative hemodynamic profiles, radionuclide ventriculography, and ECG or enzymatic evidence of myocardial damage. However, we maintain that this conclusion is valid only if adequate ventricular decompression is provided intraoperatively.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Robinson, G. D. Schwarz, D. B. Goddard, W. H. Fleming, and T. A. Galbraith Myocardial protection for acquired heart disease surgery: Results of a national survey Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1995; 59(2): 361 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B Riley, S. B Hardin, B. A Winn, and M. B Hurdle In vitro comparison of cavoatrial (dual stage) cannulae for use during cardiopulmonary bypass Perfusion, July 1, 1986; 1(3): 197 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, D. D. Woodhall, D. G. Knauf, and J. A. Alexander Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Clinical Comparison of Cold Blood Potassium Cardioplegia, Warm Cardioplegic Induction, and Secondary Cardioplegia Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1985; 40(5): 483 - 487. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, D. D. Woodhall, C. R. Conti, D. W. Ellison, R. Fisher, C. Richards, R. G. Marks, D. G. Knauf, and J. A. Alexander Mortality, Morbidity, and Cost-Accounting Related to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the Elderly Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1985; 39(5): 426 - 432. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, R. S. Faro, M. R. Rubin, C. J. Pepine, R. L. Feldman, D. W. Ellison, J. LoPresti, E. D. Staples, D. G. Knauf, and J. A. Alexander Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Threatened Acute Myocardial Infarction Related to Coronary Artery Catheterization Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1985; 39(2): 116 - 124. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, R. S. Faro, W. D. Watson, D. G. Knauf, T. Hankins, and J. A. Alexander Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Relative Efficacy of Initial Proximal versus Distal Anastomoses Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1984; 38(1): 15 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |