ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arthur J. Roberts
Richard S. Faro
Daniel K. Knauf
James A. Alexander
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. A.

Ann Thorac Surg 1983;36:444-452
© 1983 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Relative Efficacy of Left Ventricular Venting and Venous Drainage Techniques Commonly Used during Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Arthur J. Roberts, M.D.*, Richard S. Faro, M.D., Lloyd A. Williams, M.D., Jerry A. Cohen, M.D., Daniel K. Knauf, M.D., James A. Alexander, M.D.

Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery and the Department of Anesthesia, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Roberts, Director of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Division of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610

Sixty patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft operation were prospectively randomized into one of six equal groups based on the intraoperative method of left ventricular venting and venous drainage. Group 1 had bicaval venous drainage without snaring and left ventricular venting through the superior pulmonary vein; Group 2, two-stage venous drainage and venting as in Group 1; Group 3, bicaval venous drainage without snaring and no left ventricular vent; Group 4, two-stage venous drainage and no left ventricular vent; Group 5, bicaval venous drainage without snaring and with ascending aortic venting through a catheter; and Group 6, two-stage venous drainage and venting as in Group 5. Left ventricular performance was determined by radionuclide ventriculography from which global ejection fraction and regional wall motion were determined. Cardiac output was obtained by the thermodilution technique. Myocardial temperature was assessed by a needle thermistor during aortic cross-clamping. Serial electrocardiograms and levels of myocardial-specific isoenzymes (serum CPK-MB) were also analyzed.

Each of the techniques tested was equally effective as determined by an analysis of intraoperative myocardial cooling and postoperative hemodynamic profiles, radionuclide ventriculography, and ECG or enzymatic evidence of myocardial damage. However, we maintain that this conclusion is valid only if adequate ventricular decompression is provided intraoperatively.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. A. Robinson, G. D. Schwarz, D. B. Goddard, W. H. Fleming, and T. A. Galbraith
Myocardial protection for acquired heart disease surgery: Results of a national survey
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1995; 59(2): 361 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
J. B Riley, S. B Hardin, B. A Winn, and M. B Hurdle
In vitro comparison of cavoatrial (dual stage) cannulae for use during cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, July 1, 1986; 1(3): 197 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Roberts, D. D. Woodhall, D. G. Knauf, and J. A. Alexander
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Clinical Comparison of Cold Blood Potassium Cardioplegia, Warm Cardioplegic Induction, and Secondary Cardioplegia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1985; 40(5): 483 - 487.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Roberts, D. D. Woodhall, C. R. Conti, D. W. Ellison, R. Fisher, C. Richards, R. G. Marks, D. G. Knauf, and J. A. Alexander
Mortality, Morbidity, and Cost-Accounting Related to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the Elderly
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1985; 39(5): 426 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Roberts, R. S. Faro, M. R. Rubin, C. J. Pepine, R. L. Feldman, D. W. Ellison, J. LoPresti, E. D. Staples, D. G. Knauf, and J. A. Alexander
Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Threatened Acute Myocardial Infarction Related to Coronary Artery Catheterization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1985; 39(2): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Roberts, R. S. Faro, W. D. Watson, D. G. Knauf, T. Hankins, and J. A. Alexander
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Relative Efficacy of Initial Proximal versus Distal Anastomoses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1984; 38(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1983 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.