HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zurick, A. M. Articles by Greenstreet, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zurick, A. M. Articles by Greenstreet, R.

Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34:608-611
© 1982 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Failure of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure to Decrease Postoperative Bleeding after Cardiac Surgery

From The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Departments of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Cleveland, OH

Accepted for publication February 19, 1982.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr. Zurick, Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106

To determine whether the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in the postoperative period after cardiac operation would reduce postoperative blood loss, the number of transfusions required, or the rate of reoperation for bleeding, we conducted a prospective study of 83 patients who underwent elective coronary revascularization. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either PEEP (10 cm H₂O) or no PEEP (zero end-expiratory pressure). All other aspects of their care were identical.

There was no statistically significant reduction in the amount of bleeding in patients treated with PEEP at 8 or 24 hours postoperatively. There was no significant difference in hematocrit between the groups preoperatively or postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of reexplorations for bleeding. Finally, there was no significant difference between the groups in the amount of blood administered.

On the basis of our results, we conclude that the application of PEEP in the postoperative period of cardiac operation did not reduce the amount of blood loss, the need for reexploration for bleeding, or the blood requirements in this group of patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Salenger, J. S. Gammie, and T. J. Vander Salm Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgical Patients Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 439 - 469. [Full Text]