HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Orringer, M. B. Articles by Orringer, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Orringer, M. B. Articles by Orringer, J. S.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 34, 237-248, Copyright © 1982 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Esophagectomy: definitive treatment for esophageal neuromotor dysfunction

MB Orringer and JS Orringer

Twenty-two patients with a history of between one and four (average of two) unsuccessful prior esophageal operations for neuromotor dysfunction were treated with esophageal resection and replacement. Eleven (50%) had recurred reflux esophagitis in association with various disorders of motility: esophageal spasm in 4, achalasia in 3, scleroderma in 2, and esophageal atresia in 2. Eight (36%) had primary esophageal spasm and 3 (14%) had achalasia. Esophageal obstruction, regurgitation, and severe spasm were the most common manifestations of the inability to swallow normally. Transthoracic or transhiatal (blunt) esophagectomies were performed in 5 and 17 patients, respectively. The stomach, with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, was used for esophageal substitution in 15 patients. Six patients underwent a long- segment colonic interposition, and 1 patient with achalasia underwent a distal esophagectomy and short-segment colonic interposition. One patient undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for achalasia died from unrecognized intraoperative bleeding into the opposite chest. There were no other operative deaths. Additional complications included transient hoarseness in 8 patients, chylothorax in 1, and anastomotic leak in 1. After an average follow-up of 25 months for the 21 surviving patients, ability to eat is regarded as good in 18 (85%), fair in 1 (5%), and poor in 2 (10%). In patients with incapacitating esophageal neuromotor disease, a more radical operative approach-esophagectomy-- may be safer and more reliable than attempting another procedure and risking another failure. Esophagectomy ensures definitive elimination of the esophageal problem and as optimal an ability to eat as possible. Our experience suggests that the stomach, with a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, offers a better functional esophageal substitute than does a colonic interposition.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Kent, J. D. Luketich, K. Irshad, O. Awais, M. Alvelo-Rivera, P. Churilla, H. C. Fernando, and R. J. Landreneau Comparison of Surgical Approaches to Recalcitrant Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Patient with Scleroderma Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1710 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Young, C. Deschamps, V. F. Trastek, M. S. Allen, D. L. Miller, C. D. Schleck, and P. C. Pairolero Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: early morbidity, mortality, and functional results Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1651 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]