ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prager, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Prager, R. L.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 34, 176-180, Copyright © 1982 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Alterations in pulmonary function following pneumonectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma

EJ Dunn, J Hernandez, HW Bender Jr and RL Prager

Twenty-one patients who underwent pneumonectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma at the Nashville Veterans Administration Hospital from November, 1977, to March, 1980, were evaluated with standard pulmonary function tests preoperatively and postoperatively. Twelve patients had Stage I disease, 4 patients had Stage II, and 5 patients had Stage III disease. The interval between the operative procedure and postoperative testing ranged from 2 to 33 months (mean, 12.4 months). Mean functional loss of pulmonary capacity after pneumonectomy was based on analysis of preoperative and postoperative forced vital capacity (FVC) and initial- second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) indices. The mean functional loss as expressed by FVC was 41.5% after right pneumonectomy and 34.0% after left pneumonectomy. The mean functional loss as expressed by FEV1 was 40.2% after right pneumonectomy and 38.3% after left pneumonectomy. The postoperative functional status of each patient was classified according to the New York Heart Association criteria. Nineteen of the 21 patients were in Class I or II preoperatively. Postoperatively, 10 patients were in Class I or II and 11 in Class III or IV. The results indicate that a postoperative FVC less than 2.5 liters and FEV1 less than 1.5 liters are not compatible with active life.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Refai, M. Salati, R. Marasco, V. Sciarra, and A. Sabbatini
Evaluation of Expiratory Volume, Diffusion Capacity, and Exercise Tolerance Following Major Lung Resection: A Prospective Follow-up Analysis
Chest, January 1, 2007; 131(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. R. Larsen, U. G. Svendsen, N. Milman, J. Brenoe, and B. N. Petersen
Cardiopulmonary Function at Rest and During Exercise After Resection for Bronchial Carcinoma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1997; 64(4): 960 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1982 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.