ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sade, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hohn, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sade, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hohn, A. R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 33, 570-575, Copyright © 1982 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Inflow occlusion for semilunar valve stenosis

RM Sade, FA Crawford and AR Hohn

Twenty-nine patients have had valvotomy with inflow occlusion since 1975 at our institution: 7 for aortic stenosis and 22 for pulmonary stenosis. All patients with aortic stenosis and 11 with pulmonary stenosis were neonates. Six patients died, 3 with aortic stenosis and 3 with pulmonary stenosis. All of them were less than 2 days old. Two newborns with critical pulmonary stenosis required reoperation with an outflow patch at age 22 and 25 months. To determine morbidity and expense of inflow occlusion versus cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with pulmonary stenosis, we compared the 11 patients who were not infants and who had inflow occlusion (age range, 3.5 to 26.8 years) with 10 patients who were operated on concurrently and who required bypass to correct associated minor intracardiac lesions (age range, 2.6 to 26.4 years). Significant differences (p less than 0.01) were as follows (inflow occlusion versus bypass): operating room time, 2.0 +/- 0.4 versus 3.6 +/- 0.8 hours (mean +/- standard deviation); blood utilized, 0.3 +/- 0.5 versus 1.7 +/- 1.7 units; and total expense, $4,600 +/- 800 versus $7,000 +/- 1,600. Thus, inflow occlusion is safe in patients more than 2 days old, with early and late results similar to bypass, and is an attractive alternative for patients with isolated pulmonary valvular stenosis and for newborns with aortic stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Mavroudis and R. M. Sade
The Southern Thoracic Surgical Association 50th anniversary celebration: the impact of STSA pediatric cardiothoracic surgery manuscripts on surgical practice
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(90050): S47 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1982 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.