ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Duran, C. M.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 31, 444-449, Copyright © 1981 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Heart valve replacement with the Hancock bioprosthesis: a 6-year review

JI Gallo, B Ruiz, MF Carrion, JA Gutierrez, JL Vega and CM Duran

All patients who had a mitral or aortic Hancock valve replacement between June, 1974, and June, 1979, were reviewed. A total of 734 bioprostheses were implanted in 632 patients: 291 had mitral (MVR), 239 had aortic (AVR), and 102 had both mitral and aortic valve replacement (MVR + AVR). In 228 patients, an associated surgical procedure was necessary. It involved conservative valve operation in 205 of them. The hospital mortality was 9.6% (28) for MVR (11.5% with associated operation), 4.6% (11) for AVR (8.7% with associated operation), and 13.7% (14) for MVR + AVR (13.0% with associated operation). The follow- up period was between 1 and 6 years with a total follow-up of 934.6, 714.6, and 288.3 patient-years for MVR, AVR and MVR + AVR, respectively. The late mortality was 0.96% (9), 1.53% (11), and 2.08% (6) per patient-year for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. The thromboembolic rate was 1.49%, 0.14%, and 2.08% per patient-year for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. There were twelve valve failure (six wer due to rupture; four, thrombosis; one, insufficiency because of intrinsic failure; and one, stenosis without evident cause at reoperation). This represents a failure rate of 0.53%, 0.13%, and 2.08% per patient-year for MVR, AVR, and MVR + AVR, respectively. These results encourage us to continue our routine use of the glutaraldehyde xenografts as the safest valve substitute at present.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.