ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wisoff, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hamby, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wisoff, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hamby, R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 29, 440-443, Copyright © 1980 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Combined valve and coronary artery surgery

BG Wisoff, R Fogel, D Weisz, J Garvey and R Hamby

From 1970 to 1978, 79 patients (Group 1) underwent combined valve replacement and coronary bypass operation. They were compared with 79 consecutive subsequent patients (Group 2) undergoing similar valve replacement. In Group 1, 73% were men compared with 48% in Group 2. The average age in Group 1 was 60 years (range, 42 to 84 years) and in Group 2, 57 years (range, 29 to 74 years). When the patients were first seen, angina was present in 49% in Group 1 and only 24% in Group 2. More than 95% of the patients in both groups were in New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV. Areas of abnormal contraction were twice as frequent in the angiograms of patients in Group 1 (43%). Thirty-three mitral, 44 aortic, and 2 aortic plus mitral valve replacements were performed in each group. One to 4 grafts were placed in each patient group. One to 4 grafts were placed in each patient in Group 1, and most had single or double grafts. Early morbidity was more frequent in Group 1. Early mortality was 5 to 6% in each group. Late mortality (average, 3.5 years after operation) was 16 to 17% in each group. The working status and Functional Classification at follow-up were similar for patients in both groups. Combined valve and coronary operation carried a similar operation risk and had similar late results as valve replacement alone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
B. Yamak, A T. Ulus, S F. Katircioglu, B. Mavitas, A. Saritas, O. Tasdemir, and K. Bayazit
Surgery for Combined Rheumatic Valve and Coronary Artery Disease
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 1999; 7(1): 33 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1980 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.