ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Horace MacVaugh, III
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, N.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, N.
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, B. E.

Ann Thorac Surg 1980;29:15-19
© 1980 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Bradykinin, Plasma Protein Fraction, and Hypotension

Norig Ellison, M.D.*, Marjam Behar, Ph.D., Horace MacVaugh, III, M.D., Bryan E. Marshall, M.D.

Departments of Anesthesia and Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Accepted for publication March 6, 1979.

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Ellison, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104

A directive from the Food and Drug Administration indicates that the use of plasma protein fraction (PPF) is contraindicated during cardiopulmonary bypass because of possible hypotension. Bradykinin has been implicated as the cause of this hypotension.

Bradykinin levels were measured by radioimmunoassay in PPF and in 5% albumin and were found to be consistently elevated in the former and occasionally in the latter. The addition of PPF to pump primes resulted in significantly elevated levels of bradykinin, which rapidly cleared, indicating that extrapulmonary sites of bradykinin inactivation were efficient. The potential hypotensive effect of PPF was observed by determining the change in mean perfusion pressure in two groups of patients: one group with a 3,000 ml crystalloid prime and the other with a prime of 2,000 ml of crystalloid and 1,000 ml of PPF. There was no significant difference in the perfusion pressure between the two groups at any point, and the hypotensive effects seen in both groups were readily treated, suggesting that the directive against the use of PPF during cardiopulmonary bypass may be unnecessarily restrictive.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. W. Downing and L. H. Edmunds Jr
Release of vasoactive substances during cardiopulmonary bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1992; 54(6): 1236 - 1243.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Heinonen, K. Peltola, J.-J. Himberg, and H. Suomela
Correlation of Hypotensive Effect of Plasma Protein Fraction with Prekallikrein Activator Activity: A Clinical Study in Patients Having Open-Heart Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1982; 33(3): 244 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1980 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.