ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szentpetery, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lower, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szentpetery, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lower, R. R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 27, 399-403, Copyright © 1979 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Pull-through esophagectomy without thoracotomy for esophageal carcinoma

S Szentpetery, T Wolfgang and RR Lower

Seventeen consecutive patients underwent pull-through esophagectomy using blunt dissection from laparotomy and cervical incisions for carcinoma of the esophagus. Fifteen patients had a middle-third lesion while 2 patients had a distal-third lesion. The gastrointestinal tract was reconstructed using primary gastroesophagostomy in 15 patients and colon interposition in 2. Both the colon and stomach were placed through the posterior mediastinum. The surgical technique and results are described in detail. There were two major complications. One patient died of massive gastric hemorrhage on the eighth postoperative day in spite of emergency operation. Another patient sustained a tear of the membranous trachea at the time of blunt dissection. This was repaired through a right thoracotomy without difficulty. Esophagectomy using blunt dissection offered excellent palliation and resulted in little morbidity in our series. The shortened operating time, minimal blood loss, total lack of postoperative chest pain, minimal pulmonary complications, and the benefit of a cervical anastomosis are several advantages compared with the present surgical approaches.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1979 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.