|
|
||||||||
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 26, 336-343, Copyright © 1978 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
RB Pyle, JE Mayer Jr, WG Lindsay, CR Jorgensen, Y Wang and DM Nicoloff
The central-flow low profile disc-valve prosthesis has been offered as an
alternative to ball- and tissue-valve prostheses. Extensive laboratory
investigation with both pulse duplicator and experimental animals has been
reported for the Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis. A series of patients receiving
this prosthesis underwent postoperative cardiac catheterization to better
define the hemodynamic function of this prosthesis in vivo. Because of the
variations in reports of hemodynamic data from various institutions, the
results of post-operative studies in an earlier group of patients with
Starr-Edwards prostheses were used as a standard for comparison. Good
hemodynamic function was found with the pivoting-disc prosthesis in all but
the smallest valve sizes. Lillehei-Kaster and early model Starr-Edwards
prostheses with equivalent tissue annulus dimensions were found to have
nearly equal valve areas in vivo in the aortic position. The
Lillehei-Kaster mitral valves provided larger areas than Starr-Edwards
prostheses in large tissue annulus sizes.
ARTICLES
Hemodynamic evaluation of Lillehei-Kaiser and Starr-Edwards prosthesis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |