ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyers, G. F. O.
Right arrow Articles by Brownlee, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyers, G. F. O.
Right arrow Articles by Brownlee, R. R.

Ann Thorac Surg 1978;25:571-587
© 1978 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Current Status of Pacemaker Power Sources

G. Frank O. Tyers, M.D.*, Robert R. Brownlee, M.S.E.E.

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Tyers, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550

After years during which pacers of very similar design and capabilities were provided by a small number of manufacturers, many different lithium, halogen, rechargeable, and nuclear power sources are now available. The variety of chemistries, methods of construction, and sealing techniques used in the batteries of the different manufacturers is almost unlimited. This has made it necessary for physicians who implant and follow pacers to acquire a general knowledge of the field if they are to make an informed choice of pacemaker power source for implantation and if they are to manage recalls with a minimum of patient and physician trauma. More experience is required before it can be definitely determined which of the new pacer power sources will prove superior, but when coupled with well-designed, hermetically sealed pulse generators, all are capable of providing continuous pacing for at least 5 years and the 10-year pacemaker is now a probability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. F. O. Tyers
Pacing at a Very Short Pulse Width
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1979; 27(6): 590 - 590.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. B. McGuire and S. P. Nolan
The Care of Patients at Increased Risk of Premature Pacemaker Failure
JAMA, February 16, 1979; 241(7): 701 - 703.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1978 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.