ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Leigh I.G. Iverson
Roger R. Ecker
Ivan A. May
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iverson, L. I. G.
Right arrow Articles by May, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iverson, L. I. G.
Right arrow Articles by May, I. A.

Ann Thorac Surg 1978;25:197-200
© 1978 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

A Comparative Study of IPPB, the Incentive Spirometer, and Blow Bottles: The Prevention of Atelectasis Following Cardiac Surgery

Leigh I.G. Iverson, M.D.*, Roger R. Ecker, M.D., Harold E. Fox, M.D., Ivan A. May, M.D.

Thoracic Surgical Service, Samuel Merritt Hospital, Oakland, CA.

Accepted for publication August 4, 1977.

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Iverson, Broadway Webster Medical Plaza, Suite 304, 3300 Webster St, Oakland, CA 94609

Following cardiac operations, 145 patients were treated with either intermittent positive-pressure breathing (IPPB), blow bottles, or an incentive spirometer in an attempt to alter the incidence of atelectasis. Pulmonary complications occurred in 30% of the patients receiving IPPB, 15% of those using an incentive spirometer, and 8% of those using blow bottles. Gastrointestinal side-effects occurred in 20% of the IPPB group and were rare in other groups. The cost of IPPB is also considerably greater than either incentive spirometry or blow bottles. IPPB is not essential to prevention of atelectasis in postoperative cardiac surgical patients and may be inferior to other methods.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. N. Mavros, G. C. Velmahos, and M. E. Falagas
Atelectasis as a Cause of Postoperative Fever: Where Is the Clinical Evidence?
Chest, August 1, 2011; 140(2): 418 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Pasquina, M. R Tramer, and B. Walder
Prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy after cardiac surgery: systematic review
BMJ, December 13, 2003; 327(7428): 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
L. Denehy and S. Berney
The use of positive pressure devices by physiotherapists
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 821 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1978 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.