HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Robert T. Potter Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Giannelli, S. Articles by Moreno, A. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Giannelli, S., Jr. Articles by Moreno, A. H.

Ann Thorac Surg 1976;22:347-355
© 1976 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Constant-Pressure Coronary Artery Perfusion during Aortic Valve Operations

Departments of Surgery and Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New York, and the Department of Surgery, The Brooklyn-Cumberland Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr. Giannelli, Division of Cardiac Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New York, 153 W 11th St, New York, NY 10011.

We considered the theoretical differences between the normal relationships of coronary blood flow and perfusion pressure in the working heart and those obtained with continuous, steady-flow perfusion by a roller pump during aortic valve replacement. Steady pump perfusion should deliver less blood flow to the endocardium because:

1. For the same mean artery perfusion pressure, the average coronary blood flow is less with constant-flow pump perfusion.

2. With constant pump perfusion, pressure would be excessively high during systole, and during diastole it would be significantly lower than the mean perfusion pressure.

Instantaneous pressure and flow were measured in the left coronary artery in 8 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, employing either roller pump perfusion or a gravity flow system to provide a steady pressure source. Although we did not attempt to demonstrate improved endocardial flow, the mean left coronary flow was always greater with gravity perfusion (297 versus 153 ml/min), lending support to the theoretically proposed differences between the two perfusion methods.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Karkola, E. Saarela, S. Tuononen, R. Pokela, L. Nuutinen, M. I. Kairaluoma, and T. K. I. Larmi Intraoperative Changes in Coronary Resistance During Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1978; 25(5): 407 - 412. [Abstract] [PDF]