HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allard, J. R. Articles by Dobell, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allard, J. R. Articles by Dobell, A. R.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 21, 243-246, Copyright © 1976 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Interrupted aortic arch: factors influencing prognosis

JR Allard, RL Williams and AR Dobell

From January, 1969, to June, 1974, 11 infants with interrupted aortic arch were operated upon. Eight of them died in the perioperative period. Their cases were reviewed in an attempt to find factors influencing the prognosis. Age, weight, preoperative hemodynamics, angiographic findings, and the type of arch anomaly did not influence the outcome. The operation, whether palliative or involving intracardiac repair, did not affect the prognosis. The only factor related to the outcome was the size of the conduit: in all infants who died, the vessel used to bridge the gap (carotid or subclavian artery) was of narrow diameter. In the 3 patients who survived it was of much larger bore. We conclude that in the repair of interrupted aortic arch, an adequate conduit is essential for success.