ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arthur C. Beall, Jr.
George C. Morris, Jr.
George P. Noon
Michael E. DeBakey
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beall, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by DeBakey, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beall, A. C., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by DeBakey, M. E.

Ann Thorac Surg 1976;21:144-150
© 1976 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Clinical Experience with the Teflo Disposable Membrane Oxygenator

Arthur C. Beall, Jr., M.D.*, R. Thomas Solis, M.D., Mohamed Kakvan, M.D., George C. Morris, Jr., M.D., George P. Noon, M.D., Michael E. DeBakey, M.D.

From the Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery and the Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

Accepted for publication September 3, 1975.

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Beall, 1200 Moursund Ave, Houston, TX 77025

A simple, inexpensive, highly efficient disposable membrane oxygenator with low priming volume and a microporous membrane recently has become available. Animal and clinical investigations of its use have been most satisfactory, and clinical experience now has been extended to include 285 patients. Its primary advantage has been the ability to control oxygenation and carbon dioxide separately. Disadvantages have included the somewhat increased complexity of the system as compared with bubble oxygenator systems, the necessity of converting pumps for its use, and excessive condensation of water vapor in the gas phase of the oxygenator unless certain precautions are followed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. J. A. M. van den Dungen, G. F. Karliczek, U. Brenken, J. N. H. van der Heide, and C. R. H. Wildevuur
The Effect of Prostaglandin E1 in Patients Undergoing Clinical Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1983; 35(4): 406 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Suma, T. Tsuji, Y. Takeuchi, K. Inoue, K. Shiroma, T. Yoshikawa, and J. Narumi
Clinical Performance of Microporous Polypropylene Hollow-Fiber Oxygenator
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1981; 32(6): 558 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
R. L. Hardesty, G. M. Deeb, B. P. Griffith, and H. S. Borovetz
Clinical Experience With Pediatric Microporous Oxygenator for Profound Hypothermia
Arch Surg, November 1, 1980; 115(11): 1355 - 1358.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1976 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.