HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Wilford B. Neptune Mian M. Ashraf Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Overholt, R. H. Articles by Ashraf, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Overholt, R. H. Articles by Ashraf, M. M.

Ann Thorac Surg 1975;20:511-519
© 1975 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

---

Articles

Primary Cancer of the Lung

A 42-Year Experience

Overholt Thoracic Clinic, New England Baptist and New England Deaconess Hospitals, Boston, Mass.

^* Address reprint requests to Dr. Overholt, Overholt Thoracic Clinic, 135 Francis St., Boston, Mass. 02215

Between April, 1932, and July, 1974, 3,808 patients with primary lung cancer were studied and 1,848 underwent resection. Among untreated patients, 95% were dead within a year.

Unresected cancer of the lung is so lethal that efforts to streamline surgical management should not be neglected. In good-risk patients with isolated lesions the approach can be direct. If surgical excision is indicated, regardless of a positive or negative sputum cytology, bronchoscopic biopsy, or brush biopsy, such investigations become superfluous. Needle biopsy is also inconclusive and in addition is hazardous. Preoperative investigation should focus on cardiopulmonary reserve more than on ways to obtain tissue for verification.

With the passage of time, the extent of resection has become more conservative. The value of palliative resection is now better appreciated in terms of quality of life, its prolongation, and, for some, a possibility for cure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Carr, M. J. Schuchert, A. Pennathur, D. O. Wilson, J. M. Siegfried, J. D. Luketich, and R. J. Landreneau Impact of tumor size on outcomes after anatomic lung resection for stage 1A non-small cell lung cancer based on the current staging system. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2012; 143(2): 390 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Martin-Ucar, R. Nicum, I. Oey, J. G. Edwards, and D. A. Waller En-bloc chest wall and lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Predictors of 60-day non-cancer related mortality Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2003; 23(6): 859 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Izbicki, W. T. Knoefel, B. Passlick, M. Habekost, O. Karg, and O. Thetter RISK ANALYSIS AND LONG-TERM SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING EXTENDED RESECTION OF LOCALLY ADVANCED LUNG CANCER J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1995; 110(2): 386 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Wakabayashi Thoracoscopic Partial Lung Resection in Patients With Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Preliminary Report Arch Surg, September 1, 1994; 129(9): 940 - 944. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. B. Neptune Primary Lung Cancer Surgery in Stage II and Stage III Arch Surg, May 1, 1988; 123(5): 583 - 585. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. F. Bennett and R. A. Smith Segmental Resection for Bronchogenic Carcinoma: A Surgical Alternative for the Compromised Patient Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1979; 27(2): 169 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. F. Mountain Assessment of the Role of Surgery for Control of Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1977; 24(4): 365 - 373. [Abstract] [PDF]