ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Douglas M. Behrendt
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jochim, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jochim, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Behrendt, D. M.

Ann Thorac Surg 1975;20:30-38
© 1975 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Evaluation of Myocardial Function

Kenneth E. Jochim, Ph.D., Douglas M. Behrendt, M.D.*

From the Department of Physiology and the Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich.

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Behrendt, C-7175 University Hospital, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48104.

In assessing myocardial contractility one may examine isolated heart muscle, the isolated whole heart in controlled circumstances, or the heart in an intact patient. In each situation a number of different indices of contractility may be recorded, each of which has merit but none of which is perfect. Some reflect events occurring during isometric contraction prior to ejection, such as rate of change in intraventricular pressure, maximum velocity of muscle shortening, and velocity of shortening of contractile elements. Others reflect ejection phenomena such as stroke volume, the Starling curve, and the ejection fraction. None of these indices is entirely independent of preload, afterload, and heart rate, and these factors must be controlled. In the whole heart, especially in a clinical setting, this may be difficult. Many clinical studies of myocardial function fail to recognize the need for controlling these variables and therefore are of limited validity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. D. Crittenden
Intraoperative metabolic monitoring of the heart: I. Clinical assessment of coronary sinus metabolites
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): S2220 - S2226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. M. Behrendt
Use and misuse of the ejection fraction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1995; 60(5): 1166 - 1168.
[PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. S. Mankad and M. H. Yacoub
Systolic and diastolic function of both ventricles after prolonged cardioplegic arrest
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1993; 55(4): 933 - 939.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1975 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.